MSOC Forums

Go Back   MSOC Forums > Technical > Engine Tuning
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Engine Tuning All technical chat regarding the 2JZ

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th June 2004, 04:04 PM   #51
wez
Senior Member
 
wez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (Martin F @ June 14 2004,16:57)]Having that VSV on the wastegate actuator removes progressive opening of the wategate valve as boost increases. When the VSV switches the wastegate should open pretty rapidly and reduce boost pressure.

Obviously this is a simplified explanation as IIRC the wastegate VSV works on a PWM signal.
Exactly right and with the AEM you can control this VSV along with all the others.

As for the PWM this allows you to dictate how much air/pressure is allowed to act on the waistgate by varying the amount/rate the solenoid opens and closes.

__________________
96 Silver T-6, S6GP ECU, 591bhp & 523ft/lbs, CW SMIC
Dyno Plot Photo Gallery Turbos Compared 2BarTuning
Steve Manley 01865 291300
wez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2004, 04:09 PM   #52
Nathan
Senior Member
 
Nathan's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 605
Default

Martin's got it right. The stock system, which even itself is pretty crude compared to an aftermarket boost controller, is still a LOT better in terms of boost control than a bleed valve which as you say pretty much give the boost they feel like depending on what colour pants you have on. The big downside is you can't play about with gain controls as Chief explained and this can have a dramatic effect on how and when the turbos spool. Having a decent boost control system also means they sit bang on whatever you tell them to which is fairly important when healthy Soops love 1.2 bar but can and will det on 1.3 (many will argue the toss because they can't hear it though)

As for going beyond 1 bar on No1 I agree, it will be working hard but we let them sit at what they want to TBH when we fit EBC's. It's not really worth playing about for X amount of time (well, not paying us to do it but the customer can if they want) to worry about 0.1bar on No1. It's not a longevity/reliability issue as far as I am concerned as Jap turbos can and do go pop when they feel like it and steels won't care at all. As for loss of performance, I don't agree although I accept that you may not actually make any more power at 1 bar as opposed to 0.9.

Trollage? You got long green wispy hair then?
__________________
Nathan
TDI PLC

We like VVT-i's, especially ECU solutions :-)
Nathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2004, 04:16 PM   #53
Nathan
Senior Member
 
Nathan's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (wez @ June 14 2004,17:04)]Exactly right and with the AEM you can control this VSV along with all the others.
Stock VSV's aren't really much good for anything other than stock boost IMO. They are slow to react and don't like being pulsed- in fact they are designed to be off or on really unlike say the HKS EVC stepper motor which really does shift.

In fact I'd wager that most drivers could tell the difference in boost response and peak boost hold with an EVC even only peaking on stock boost levels.
__________________
Nathan
TDI PLC

We like VVT-i's, especially ECU solutions :-)
Nathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2004, 04:57 PM   #54
chiefgroover
Senior Member
 
chiefgroover's Avatar
 
Single Turbo - Manual
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 821
Default

What have i done? what have i started? lmao.
damm it, i'll weld the actuators closed and make a big ramp, hopefully i'll break through the earths atmosphere in the low 10's, lapping the moon at warp factor 9 on opposite lock leaving black doughnuts so watch the night sky for the banded moon!. Nat, Mr.Scott (after reaching warp drive) will e mail you the egt's and afr's from our built in satellite station, and if you think they a bit odd, we can beam you up for some fine tuning!.
Supra boost control...............thats a subject that could start a war, I'm glad we can laugh about it
__________________
T04Z 676BHP 6 speed Lambo Griglo Avalon AEM by Dimitri, custom JIC magic, Rotora BBK & super sweet sounding Tanabe Touring. www.bigsupra.co.uk
"If they can mass produce it- it will change the nature of our world"- BMW M Power Development team in 1991 on seeing the prototype MkIV Supra.
chiefgroover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2004, 09:39 PM   #55
Syed Shah
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 192
Send a message via AIM to Syed Shah
Default

I still think a MBC is the way to go, as long as you have a boost guage, it is fine. Not to say it is any bettert han a EBC, but it does the job reliably and holds osst well, all you *need*, though not the gadget most *want*.
__________________
UK 6sp BPU
J-spec NA
R6 *rip*
Soarer TT
Syed Shah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2004, 09:57 PM   #56
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (Syed Shah @ June 14 2004,14:54)]MBC does the job just as well.
OK

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (Syed Shah @ June 14 2004,22:39)]Not to say it is any bettert han a EBC,
Hmmmmmm.

In fact i think there is quite a difference between an MBC and an EBC just like there is quite a difference between a ball & spring MBC and the traditional ?4.99 bleed valve.

A ball and spring MBC will still progressively open and allow pressure to act on the wastegate actuator just not to the extent of the bleed valve. Also how do you change the boost setting on an MBC ?

Maybe i'm fortunate enough that my car already came with the DSBC, but being able to floor it (once setup) and see the boost sit at 1.35Kg/cm constantly with very little fluctuation had me sold.
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2004, 02:46 PM   #57
Ian C
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 57
Default

I was under the impression that the stock wastegate VSV simply opened at a set pressure level to stop wastegate creep. It's either open or shut, it doesn't get pulsed. Is this correct or not? I mean, has anyone verified this by logging the signal, not just theoretically?

I have an Apexi boost controller and it can't hold boost to save it's life. The datalogging I've been doing shows, despite me setting it to 1.3bar and feeding it a reasonable duty cycle, a variance from 1.1 to 1.3bar under WOT in 3rd gear. I used to slag it off because of this but lately I've been thinking it's more to do with the hybrids outgunning the stock wastegate so much that even with the restrictor ring in place the boost fluctuates so much the boost controller doesn't really stand a chance of maintaining a set level Goalposts always moving and all that.

Bleed valve may well do the job, and is very tempting when you compare prices, but I'd still err on the boost controller side if your wastegate can flow enough.

-Ian
Ian C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2004, 10:37 PM   #58
wez
Senior Member
 
wez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 271
Default

With the AEM I was able to control the stock waistgate VSV using PWM and hold boost at a steady 0.9bar on turbo one and then 1Bar with both online.



I am also planning on using the stock VSV with my single as I am currently using my right foot for boost control.
__________________
96 Silver T-6, S6GP ECU, 591bhp & 523ft/lbs, CW SMIC
Dyno Plot Photo Gallery Turbos Compared 2BarTuning
Steve Manley 01865 291300
wez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2004, 08:16 PM   #59
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (alex h @ June 10 2004,14:59)]There is a first turbo mod...which I have used. But it does require trial and error to test. Parts needed are 3 lengths of silicon hose a T piece and a bleeder T valve...here is a picture.
I didn't realise that this mod is actually listed on MKIV.com as well.

First Turbo Boost Mod
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2004, 08:28 PM   #60
SKI
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 35
Default

I just had my car set up by C.W with a bleed valve and it holds boost perfectly at about 1.15 bar without exception.

Turns out (on a really positive note), according to Chris who test drove my car, that my concerns over T2 coming in late with a bloody great big whack where the result of the previous owner fitting hybrids at some point. Chris had a good mess under the bonnet and the car runs great. On the subject of hybrids I?ve never driven another Soop so I?m not really able to comment on how different they feel, although froma performance perspective I do seem a fair bit faster then other cars that I would expect to hold their own, regardless of my BPU. When Chris was explaining to me what he had done he said that there were some very odd things about my car, perhaps reflected in the fact that it wanted to boost up to 1.5 bar when it was first modified, fortunately this was immediately corrected after it scared the life out of me

I also have RLTC fitted (by Chris who did a very tidy job), that really is the dogs bollocks especially in the wet, no more twitchy rear regardless of boost, would recommend it to anyone, Phil Wall (knows the system inside out) can do you a modified dat file for any situation, even snow for autos
__________________
MKIV UK-TT \"Running A Mutant\"
SKI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sequential turbo's chiefgroover Engine Tuning 40 19th June 2006 07:07 PM
Tt engine inc turbo's & box ?1000. telvis Private 0 23rd February 2005 10:03 AM
Std uk turbo's chiefgroover Private 15 3rd February 2005 03:36 PM
Modern turbo's chiefgroover Engine Tuning 10 3rd January 2005 11:15 PM
Su carb and turbo's MLC Non-Supra Tech Corner 4 6th July 2004 11:42 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2017, MSOC