MSOC Forums

Go Back   MSOC Forums > Technical > Engine Tuning
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Engine Tuning All technical chat regarding the 2JZ

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27th March 2007, 10:26 AM   #21
ozzie
Senior Member
 
Jap Spec SZ - 5 sp Manual (NA)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Were ever the Forces send me, Cyprus at the mo
Posts: 305
Default

so what happend here then
__________________

http://www.16s17s18s.co.uk for imports
http://www.kinzuru.co.uk/ for racing
'93 supra '91 honda dio moped '03 DRZ400
ozzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 09:17 AM   #22
UltraFlynn
[52.4 Miles] 50 MC 8:41
 
UltraFlynn's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,945
Default

I'm resurrecting this thread because it's exactly on-topic for what Cass is planning and I'd really be interested in knowing what would be required and how much they can be sourced for to do this.
__________________
Matt Biggin
Website Administrator | Micra Owner | Ultrarunner

      
UltraFlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 09:19 AM   #23
UltraFlynn
[52.4 Miles] 50 MC 8:41
 
UltraFlynn's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,945
Default

Parts list:
  1. Manifold
  2. Turbo
  3. Wastegate
  4. IC Piping
  5. Fuel Controller

Is it feasible to run a single on the standard j-spec fueling system?
__________________
Matt Biggin
Website Administrator | Micra Owner | Ultrarunner

      
UltraFlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:02 AM   #24
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flynn View Post
Is it feasible to run a single on the standard j-spec fueling system?
That's a very open ended question, as it depends on what turbo, what wastegate spring and how well the fuel components are performing relative to when they were new.

Theoretically (rule of thumb) the stock jap spec system could support up to about 450bhp, if all is running fine (pump, filter, injectors, fpr). However i'm always very nervous when people say they are going to fit x-turbo and keep the boost down because of the fuelling as red-mist can take over and before you know it a big bill can be on the way.
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:08 AM   #25
UltraFlynn
[52.4 Miles] 50 MC 8:41
 
UltraFlynn's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,945
Default

I agree. The temptation to push power levels are always going to be there. But if the car is running BPU ok and the turbos go pop then running a single at BPU power levels sounds like a sensible approach.

So lets talk specifics:

1/ What turbo?
2/ What wastegate? And what spring?
3/ How can you test the fuel system to identify weak components which need replacing.

400-450 sounds about right. I would imagine that everyday boost levels 400bhp would be sensible.

Personally I favour a cast manifold. They radiate less heat, don't suffer from the stresses of tubular and are more compact. For the price I think it's a better option to get one rather than a cheap tubular manifold it's probably crack.
__________________
Matt Biggin
Website Administrator | Micra Owner | Ultrarunner

      

Last edited by UltraFlynn; 12th November 2007 at 11:24 AM.
UltraFlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:21 AM   #26
Cass
Beer and more Beer
 
Cass's Avatar
 
Single Turbo - Auto
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Inverness / Scotland
Posts: 3,610
Send a message via MSN to Cass
Default

Would keeping the restrictor ring in place prevent you red misting on boost the controler.
Or whats the story there?
__________________
"Freezing worms makes them easier to sharpen!"



Cass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:23 AM   #27
UltraFlynn
[52.4 Miles] 50 MC 8:41
 
UltraFlynn's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,945
Default

I would imagine you would control boost using the wastegate spring and not a restrictor ring.
__________________
Matt Biggin
Website Administrator | Micra Owner | Ultrarunner

      
UltraFlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:38 AM   #28
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Well .....

1/ What turbo? - Owners\Purchasers Choice as there are a few out there.
2/ What wastegate? And what spring? - Depends on turbo chosen, but a 0.7 - 0.8 bar is about the lowest spring available for most wastegates i believe.
3/ How can you test the fuel system to identify weak components which need replacing. - Check the fuel pressure under load is a rough test. However the best way would be to test the pump and fuel pressure regulator on a bench. Injectors could be sent for flow testing (but may as well have them cleaned at the time). The fuel filter could be replaced as its a service item anyway.

Cast manifolds certainly have their place and on a budget conversion are probably a wise choice. Just check the quality of casting and port matching.
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 11:54 AM   #29
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flynn View Post
I would imagine you would control boost using the wastegate spring and not a restrictor ring.
The restrictor ring is only a cludge for the lack of wastegate performance in the stock J-Spec system once the CATs have been removed.

As you say, the wastegate spring should be used for controlling boost, however you probably want to supplement that with a boost controller at some point to give you more control and to stop the wastegate creeping open as boost rises.
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 04:19 PM   #30
UltraFlynn
[52.4 Miles] 50 MC 8:41
 
UltraFlynn's Avatar
 
None - Don't currently own a MKIV Supra.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin F View Post
Cast manifolds certainly have their place and on a budget conversion are probably a wise choice. Just check the quality of casting and port matching.
Induction Motorsports in the US do their own cast manifold and that proven up to 816rwhp. That for me says that you wouldn't choose a tubular manifold over a cast one for performance reasons. The shorter runners decrease spool times and I reckon it would be the right choice for a daily driver.
__________________
Matt Biggin
Website Administrator | Micra Owner | Ultrarunner

      
UltraFlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going single, Kash Engine Tuning 20 4th August 2006 08:23 PM
What's left for a single UltraFlynn General Supra Chat 4 7th July 2006 10:15 AM
A single solution UltraFlynn Performance Electronics 6 16th June 2006 03:52 PM
Threads on Single v Upgraded Twins Neil_M Engine Tuning 4 6th June 2006 12:49 PM
Are budget single kits really worth it ? Martin F Engine Tuning 5 15th September 2004 03:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2017, MSOC